Equilibrium Force: Solving for Centre of Mass | Homework Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter CH Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the center of mass in a static equilibrium scenario involving a pole and a box. Participants clarify that the phrase "the pole and the box do not change form" indicates that the center of gravity remains constant. It is suggested that person A will carry more weight due to their higher position, and the relevant equations for static equilibrium include the conditions for no net force and no net torque. The conversation emphasizes that in static situations, all forces must balance, and the forces acting on the system are vertical. The problem highlights the importance of understanding force distribution in practical scenarios like carrying objects.
CH Lee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Untitled.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure about which topic it is asked. I think it's something about the centre of mass . Because the statement " The pole and the box do not change form" . The answer is
(1 + tan Θ)/(1 - tan Θ)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are (all!) the relevant equations for static equilibrium ?

Who do you think will have to carry more in the right picture ? B or A ? Why ?

The "don't change form" remark is to reassure you the center of gravity stays in the same place in the box/pole combo.
 
BvU said:
What are (all!) the relevant equations for static equilibrium ?

Who do you think will have to carry more in the right picture ? B or A ? Why ?

The "don't change form" remark is to reassure you the center of gravity stays in the same place in the box/pole combo.

A will carry more, I think it's because he's in higher position.
And is there any special formula for static equilibrium ? I just draw a triangle and use the formula F=ma.
 
Hehe, you never had to carry something heavy down the stairs, I suppose ?

The conditions for equilibrium I hinted at in post #1 are in the first place ##\Sigma \vec F = 0## So that with your formula a = 0 ##\Rightarrow## v = constant. v = 0 remains v = 0. No translation.

But that's not enough. You also want no rotation, in other words: ##\Sigma \vec \tau = 0##.
And now the positions where the forces act come in the expressions.
 
Last edited:
CH Lee said:
A will carry more, I think it's because he's in higher position.
And is there any special formula for static equilibrium ? I just draw a triangle and use the formula F=ma.

F = ma comes into question when acceleration comes into question. Here, a = 0 and v = 0. All forces balance each other out. FA and FB act vertically upward. In which direction do you think 'W' acts?
 
The forces are vertical. That is a constraint on the answer given by the question statement. In an actual case of carrying a couch down a ramp the people doing the carrying probably would not arrange their hand-holds that way, but the problem requires it.

The pole is not rotating while it is being carried.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top