Equilibrium of Charges using Coloumbs Law

AI Thread Summary
A point charge of -0.5 C is located at the origin, while a second charge of 12 C is positioned at (1 m, 0.5 m). To find the equilibrium position for an electron, the forces exerted by both charges on the electron must be equal. The equations for the forces are derived using Coulomb's Law, leading to a relationship between the distances from the electron to each charge. The electron is expected to be located close to the negative charge due to the stronger attractive force from the positive charge. The problem can be simplified to a one-dimensional analysis, ultimately leading to a quadratic equation for the equilibrium distance.
gc33550
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge of -0.5 C is located at the origin. A second point charge of 12 C is at x = 1 m, y = 0.5 m. Find the x and y coordinates of the position at which an electron would be in equilibrium.


Homework Equations


F=k*((q_1*q_2)/r^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know that I will have to find the two forces that the point charges will have on the electron at some arbitrary point that we will eventually solve for. We then set those two forces equal to each other and then solve for the distance. Once we have the distance we can easily solve for the components using simple trig... I must be having a problem setting up my equations any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing what you have done so far. Your strategy is OK, can you do what you said you should do and write some equations down? Also drawing a picture with where you think the electron might be located should help.
 
gc33550 said:
I know that I will have to find the two forces that the point charges will have on the electron at some arbitrary point that we will eventually solve for. We then set those two forces equal to each other and then solve for the distance. Once we have the distance we can easily solve for the components using simple trig... I must be having a problem setting up my equations any help?

Hi gc33550! :smile:

I'm not sure whether you've noticed that this is a one-dimensional problem …

then just use the usual 1/r2 formula, using a different r for each charge, of course. :wink:
 
kuruman said:
Start by showing what you have done so far. Your strategy is OK, can you do what you said you should do and write some equations down? Also drawing a picture with where you think the electron might be located should help.

tiny-tim said:
Hi gc33550! :smile:

I'm not sure whether you've noticed that this is a one-dimensional problem …

then just use the usual 1/r2 formula, using a different r for each charge, of course. :wink:

Thanks for your Input. Yes I realize it is one dimensional so hear is what I have so far:
(I will define 1 as the negative charge and 2 as the positive and e will be the electron)

F_1e=k*((-.5muC*e)/R_1e^2)
F_2e=k*((12muC*e)/R_2e^2)

to find equilibrium:

F_1e= F_2e

I am then left with:

((-.5muC)/R_1e^2)=((12muC)/R_2e^2)

I know the distance of R1 to R2 because of trig. So then R_2e=(R_1e+1.12m)
As far as where the electron is it would be in the third quadrant along a straight line with the other two point charges I know it will have to be close to the negative point charge to balance out the great attractive force of the positive point charge.
Once again thanks to both of you.
 
Hi gc33550! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)
gc33550 said:
((-.5muC)/R_1e^2)=((12muC)/R_2e^2)

I know the distance of R1 to R2 because of trig. So then R_2e=(R_1e+1.12m)

(your equations are almost unreadable, but I think I follow that bit :redface: …)

ok, now substitute for R2 in the first equation, put everything on top, and you have a quadratic equation in R1 :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top