Equillibrium ladder on a wall problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter odie5533
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wall
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equilibrium problem of a ladder leaning against a wall. The user initially calculates the normal forces and friction but struggles with the torque equations, leading to incorrect results. A key error identified is the use of cosine instead of sine for calculating torque, which affects the normal force at the wall. After correcting this and recalculating, the user finds that the total force from the ground is approximately 1570 N, which is valid as it remains below the maximum static friction. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate trigonometric functions in torque calculations for equilibrium problems.
odie5533
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/4989/scanuy8.png
http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/8163/fbdzh7.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Been working on this one for at least an hour now =/

n_{1} is the normal force of the wall on the ladder
n_{2} is the normal force of the ground on the ladder

\sum F_{x} = f_{s} - n_{1} = 0
f_{s} = n_{1}

\sum F_{y} = n_{2} - m_{ladder}g - m_{weight}g = 0
n_{2} = 150(9.8) = 1470N

\tau = Fdcos\theta
\theta = sin^{-1}(4.5/5) = 64
\sum\tau = (n_{1})(5)cos(64) - (m_{ladder}g)(2.5)(cos(64)) - (m_{weight}g)(5)(cos(64)) = 0
n_{1} = 1131N

And since f_{s} = n_{1}, the answer I get is 1131N, which is wrong. If anyone can see where I messed up, I'd greatly appreciate any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It just occurred to me that it is asking for the entire force from the ground, not just the frictional force.

F_{tot} = \sqrt{n_{2}^2 + f_{s}^2} = \sqrt{1131^2 + 1470^2} = 1852 N

Still off =/


*EDIT* using the answers as I guide, I figured out a way to make my calculations match an answer, but I have a feeling it is wrong...

f_{s-max} = n_{2} * \mu_{s} = 1470(0.40) = 588N
F_{tot} = \sqrt{n_{2}^2 + f_{s-max}^2} = \sqrt{1470^2 + 588^2} = 1583 N

Which matches an answer, but I think the ladder should be sliding down with all the weight...
 
Last edited:
odie5533 said:
It just occurred to me that it is asking for the entire force from the ground, not just the frictional force.

F_{tot} = \sqrt{n_{2}^2 + f_{s}^2} = \sqrt{1131^2 + 1470^2} = 1852 N

Still off =/


*EDIT* using the answers as I guide, I figured out a way to make my calculations match an answer, but I have a feeling it is wrong...

f_{s-max} = n_{2} * \mu_{s} = 1470(0.40) = 588N
F_{tot} = \sqrt{n_{2}^2 + f_{s-max}^2} = \sqrt{1470^2 + 588^2} = 1583 N

Which matches an answer, but I think the ladder should be sliding down with all the weight...
well I'm not sure what you got anymore, but i notice that in your original post you incorrectly calculated the torque of the normal force at the wall you used cos64 when you should have used sin 64...that should give you the correct answer..the friction force at the base is not necessarily (mu)n2, it is equal or less than that value depending on your corrected torque equation.
 
n_{1}(5)sin64 = (M_{ladder}g)(2.5)cos64 + (M_{weight}g)(5)cos64
n_{1} = 550
F_{tot} = \sqrt{550^2 + 1470^2} = 1570

And 550 < f_{s-max} of 588 :D

Thanks for the help!
 
You're welcome, you did a good job with this problem, just a small trig error threw it off. It's sometimes easier to use torque as the product of the force times the perpendicular distance rather than torque = Fdsintheta, where theta is the angle between the force and displacement vectors, because it's easy to mess up on the correct theta value.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top