Equipotential Surfaces: Calculating Work Required to Move a Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move a charge from point E to F across equipotential surfaces. The user correctly identifies the potential difference as -80V and calculates the work done as 2.72 x 10^-4 J. Clarification is provided that the work is done by the user, not the electric field, which would be positive. It is emphasized that the work done by the user is negative because it opposes the electric field's force. The importance of understanding the direction of forces and potential in determining work is highlighted.
daimoku
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipotential surfaces

Homework Statement


http://personalpages.tds.net/~locowise/test/equipot1.jpg
Fig. 1 -- Some equipotential surfaces

In the figure above, you see a set of equipotentials representing an electric field in the region and some labeled points (A..G).

What is the work required by you to move a 3.4 x 10^-6 C charge from E to F?

We know k=8.99*10^9 N*m^2/C^2

Homework Equations


r = kq/v
Work = force * displacement
V2-V1=-Welec/q


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
daimoku said:
Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
What is this? Looks like you are trying to find the radii of the two equipotential surfaces. Do they look spherical?
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!

The answer looks correct, except that it should have negative sign, since the work is being done by the charge.
 
Thanks alot! You were correct-o-mundo on the negative sign!
 


The question is the work done BY ME, and NOT by the electric field. The work done by the electric field is positive as the force and displacement are in the same direction (since the charge moves from a point of higher to lower potential). Since the work is done by moving the charge without acceleration, the force given by me on the charge has to be equal and opposite to the force of the electric field on the charge. Hence the work done by me is negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top