Equivalence of two sine arguments

  • Thread starter Thread starter acherentia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence Sine
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equivalence of the sine functions Asin(kx-wt+π) and Asin(wt-kx) as mentioned in Hecht's optics. The fundamental reasoning behind this equivalence is rooted in trigonometric identities, specifically the sine addition formula sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + sin(b)cos(a). Participants confirmed the validity of this relationship through both algebraic and geometric approaches, demonstrating the versatility of trigonometric principles in solving such problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, particularly the sine addition formula.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of angular frequency (ω) and wave equations.
  • Basic knowledge of geometric interpretations of trigonometric functions.
  • Experience with optical physics as referenced in Hecht's work.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the sine addition formula in detail to understand its applications.
  • Explore the geometric interpretations of trigonometric functions on the unit circle.
  • Investigate wave equations and their representations in physics.
  • Review Hecht's optics for further insights into wave behavior and trigonometric applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying optics, mathematicians interested in trigonometric identities, and educators seeking to clarify the relationship between sine functions in wave equations.

acherentia
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hecht in his optics mentions that Asin(kx-wt+pi) is equivalent to Asin(wt-kx)
w=greek omega

Homework Equations


What is the fundamental reason behind this?

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a hunch it's plain trigonometry applied, but none of the things that I can think of bring up this result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the identity sin(a+b)=sin(a)cos(b)+sin(b)cos(a)?
 
yes, i do it works that way and thank you very much. I solved it too with a geometrical argument on the trig circle, but i like your approach much better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K