Equivalent capacitance and Kirchoff's laws

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating equivalent capacitance in a circuit resembling a Wheatstone bridge, which includes five capacitors in a bridge configuration and one capacitor in parallel. The initial confusion about applying Kirchhoff's laws is addressed, with acknowledgment that the process may be lengthy. The mention of star-delta transformations suggests alternative methods for simplifying the circuit. Ultimately, clarity is achieved regarding the circuit's structure and its components. Understanding the arrangement is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
EddiePhys
Messages
144
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



IMG_20170812_114129_01.jpg
[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no idea how to proceed. Applying Kirchoff's laws to this would be quite lengthy. This circuit is supposed to be a wheatstone bridge but I can't see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See on internet some stuff about the star-delta transformations.
I don't want to say useless things, but I would apply this method here.
http://i65.tinypic.com/2mxfvps.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0224.JPG
    IMG_0224.JPG
    39.4 KB · Views: 430
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes scottdave
Actually, there is a Wheatstone Bridge (5 caps), but the Bridge is in parallel with 1 cap.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
scottdave said:
Actually, there is a Wheatstone Bridge (5 caps), but the Bridge is in parallel with 1 cap.

Oh I see it now. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top