Equivalent Capacitance: Where to Place the Equivalent Capacitor Between A and B?

In summary,The homework statement was to find equivalent capacitance between two pieces of metal. The attempt at a solution used colored wire to help identify the nodes in the circuit. The final result was that equivalent capacitance became 2C.
  • #1
gracy
2,486
83

Homework Statement


I need to find equivalent capacitance between A and B.
problem.png


Homework Equations


##C##=##C_1##+##C_2##...
It was for parallel connection.

##\frac{1}{C}##=##\frac{1}{C_1}##+##\frac{1}{C_2}##...
It was for series connection.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to solve the problem as follows
First thing I did I used colored wire.Because i find it convenient .
EDITED.png

Then moving forward I got the following
CBY2.png


Am I correct till here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not quite. You've left gaps in the circuit wiring after replacing the series pairs with their equivalent values capacitance. When reducing a set of series capacitors you should replace all but one of them with a wire, so there are no gaps left in the wiring. You'll then want to revisit the coloring of the wiring to identify the "new" nodes.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #3
gneill said:
When reducing a set of series capacitors you should replace all but one of them with a wire, so there are no gaps left in the wiring.
IS.png

Right?
 
  • #4
No, you've removed wiring, not filled in the gaps left by the capacitors you've eliminated.

When you combine series capacitors they become one capacitor. You can't just leave a "hole" in the circuit for the ones that get pulled into the combined capacitance.

Note the difference:
- When parallel capacitors are combined you erase all but one.
- When series capacitors are combined you replace all but one with wires.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #5
CBY2.png


The reduction process left the capacitors in series with only one lead connected to the circuit.

Without both leads connected a component cannot carry current. Charge cannot move onto or off of a capacitor through one wire alone. The capacitor thus has no influence, no utility, as far as the circuit is concerned. Hence equivalent capacitance become C.
equivalent.png
 
  • #6
Read what I said above about the difference between combining series and parallel capacitors.

Combining series capacitors:

Fig1.png
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #7
gneill said:
When series capacitors are combined you replace all but one with wires.
But I am confused which wire to use?
 
  • #8
correx.png

Right?We can see all three capacitors are in parallel,hence equivalent capacitance would be 2C.
 
  • #9
gracy said:
But I am confused which wire to use?
Wire is wire... Remember, when you collapse a series of components down to one then you will be eliminating any nodes that were along the path, leaving just the two nodes at the ends where the "new" component attach. So don't expect your previous coloring scheme to survive a series reduction. Replace the wiring for the "new" capacitor with the color of the end nodes.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #10
gracy said:
View attachment 92552
Right?We can see all three capacitors are in parallel,hence equivalent capacitance would be 2C.
Yes, that's good!
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #11
SteamKing said:
The images in your post are not showing for some reason.
This is the original figure . (No, I'm not clairvoyant.)
gracy capacitors.png
 
Last edited:
  • #12
gracy said:
But I am confused which wire to use?
Yellow or blue?what if I had used yellow color instead of blue.It would be also correct,Right?It will also give 2C as equivalent capacitance.
also.png
 
  • #13
gracy said:
Yellow or blue?what if I had used yellow color instead of blue.It would be also correct,Right?It will also give 2C as equivalent capacitance.
View attachment 92553
The colors you use do not matter; they're merely an aid for identifying individual nodes when a circuit layout is complicated (or if it's purposely made tricky to interpret for a school exercise!). The colors don't change the circuit.

The circuit in this problem is simple and well laid out, so the coloring trick is not really necessary for identifying the nodes. The series connections are easy to spot right away and make a good first step in reducing the circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #14
I am also thinking not to depend on colors but what to do I understood only when I used colors,I am afraid If I 'll not use them I'll not be able to understand but I am also afraid that I'll run out of time If I'll use colors.What to do now?
 
  • #15
gracy said:
I am also thinking not to depend on colors but what to do I understand only when I used colors,I am afraid If I 'll not use them I'll unable to understand but I am also afraid that I'll run out of time If I'll use colors.What to do now?
Practice. Recognizing parallel or series connections in a circuit gets easier with practice.
Only use colors when you can't find any parallel or series opportunities by normal inspection. It's usually a technique of "last resort" for circuits that are purposely made difficult to interpret for puzzles and quizzes.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #16
Ok.:smile:
@gneill I can't thank you enough for all the answer you have given me.
You are awesome!
 
  • #17
One last thing
Is my image(I mean image drawn by me)in post #5 a valid circuit?I know it is not correct for this problem but does the circuit like that exist?Because I can't decide it's ending point between two ending points.
 
  • #18
gracy said:
One last thing
Is my image(I mean image drawn by me)in post #5 a valid circuit?I know it is not correct for this problem but does the circuit like that exist?Because I can't find it's ending point.
If someone were to present it to you and ask if it was a valid circuit, the short answer would be no. A longer answer would require some context.

It is valid in that it is physically realizable. You certainly could take real components and connect them in that fashion. Whether or not it's useful is another matter. It has no voltage or current sources, and no closed paths for current to flow so it won't do anything as is. In that respect it is not a valid circuit. But you could connect it to other components, making it a sub-circuit of some other device. It's a common enough arrangement of capacitors that you will find it embedded in other circuits.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
  • #19
gneill said:
When series capacitors are combined you replace all but one with wires.
Anyone ?
 
  • #20
gracy said:
Anyone ?
What is not clear?
 
  • #21
gracy said:
Anyone ?
That 'one' will be the equivalent capacitance.
 
  • #22
I mean in series connection we replace all the capacitors with equivalent capacitor.All capacitor's place is taken by wire but equivalent capacitor is placed in place of one of the component capacitor(here component capacitor I meant capacitors which were there in first place ;individual capacitor component of the equivalent capacitor)How will I decide which one will be that component capacitor ?
 
  • #23
As in here
fig1-png.92551.png

how you decided that equivalent capacitor would be in place of middle (component )capacitor?
 
  • #24
gracy said:
As in here
fig1-png.92551.png

how you decided that equivalent capacitor would be in place of middle (component )capacitor?
You should first 'calculate' the equivalent capacitance. Here it's C/3. Then replace all the capacitors in the original diagram with a wire. Then break the wire (anywhere between A and B) and insert the equivalent capacitor.
 
  • #25
cnh1995 said:
anywhere between A and B)
That's what I asked!
 
  • #26
gracy said:
That's what I asked!
Since there is wire elsewhere, it doesn't matter where you place the equivalent capacitor as long as it's between A and B.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy

What is equivalent capacitance?

Equivalent capacitance is a concept in electrical engineering that refers to the combined capacitance of multiple capacitors connected in a circuit. It is a measure of the overall ability of the circuit to store electrical charge.

How is equivalent capacitance calculated?

Equivalent capacitance is calculated using the formula Ceq = C1 + C2 + C3 + ..., where C1, C2, C3, etc. are the individual capacitances of the capacitors in the circuit. This formula applies for capacitors connected in parallel. For capacitors connected in series, the formula is 1/Ceq = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3 + ...

Why is equivalent capacitance important?

Equivalent capacitance is important because it allows us to simplify complex circuits and calculate their overall capacitance. It also helps in designing and troubleshooting electrical circuits.

What is the difference between series and parallel equivalent capacitance?

In series equivalent capacitance, the individual capacitances are added reciprocally, while in parallel equivalent capacitance, they are added directly. This means that in series, the equivalent capacitance is always less than the individual capacitances, while in parallel, the equivalent capacitance is always greater than the individual capacitances.

How do capacitors affect equivalent capacitance?

Capacitors in a circuit affect the equivalent capacitance by either adding to or decreasing it, depending on whether they are connected in series or parallel. Series capacitors decrease the equivalent capacitance, while parallel capacitors increase it. Additionally, the size and type of the capacitors also impact the equivalent capacitance.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
834
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
67
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
4
Replies
108
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top