Equilibrium Point: Does Internal Variable Input Need to be Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuebingen78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equlibrium Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of equilibrium points in control systems, specifically whether the internal variable input must be zero. An example is provided with a heating element in water, where the system reaches equilibrium when heat loss equals heat input, maintaining a constant temperature. It is noted that an equilibrium point can also occur when no input is applied, though this is considered trivial. The role of negative feedback in restoring a system to equilibrium is emphasized. Overall, the equilibrium point is crucial for understanding system stability and response.
tuebingen78
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
or some time the single point, in control systems they say it is the point where the internal variables of the system never change .

my question if we must have input of system zero, or it can be any value?

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you had a small heating element in a large container of water, (so the water didn't boil) the heater would heat the water until the losses due to convection, conduction and radiation equalled the power being added to the system by the heater.

At that stage, the water temperature would remain the same. This would be called an equilibrium point.

If you did nothing and didn't turn on the heater, that would also be an equilibrium point but a trivial one which you would not normally consider.
 
Equilibrium point also refers to the point that a system is restored to by negative feedback.
Bob S
 
Bob S said:
Equilibrium point also refers to the point that a system is restored to by negative feedback.
Bob S

thanks for your answer, but can you explain more or give a reference for this.
 
tuebingen78 said:
thanks for your answer, but can you explain more or give a reference for this.
Look at the first two pictures and equations for inverting and non-inverting op amps in this:
http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/opamps.htm
In both cases, the gain of the differential op-amp is very high (G > 10,000), and the gain drops out of the equation. Derive these equations using

Vout = G(Vin+ - Vin-)

The op-amp output drives the feedback circuit to the point where the voltage at both inputs are equal (equilibrium).
Bob S
 
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top