Error equation for the balmer series

  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the error in the wavelength (λ) determined by the Bohr model and the Balmer series. The user is confused about how to incorporate the error from the Rydberg constant (R) into their calculations, specifically how λ appears in their error equation. They are advised to clarify their equation by substituting values and solving for λ before proceeding with the error analysis. The importance of taking a step-by-step approach to resolve the confusion is emphasized. The conversation highlights the need for careful substitution and understanding of error propagation in physics calculations.
wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have to find the error in λ determined by the Bohr model/Balmer series. I am a bit confused with this so I'd like someone to double check my work. I don't know the exact name of this method but basically all you do is take the differential of all the values which have an error to find the error of the determined value.


Homework Equations



\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
nf and ni are discreet values so they have no error in them
R is the Rydberg constant and has an error of +-1 in the last digit so
R = (1.097 +- 1 ) * 107 m-1


The Attempt at a Solution


\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
\frac{\delta \lambda}{\lambda^2} = \delta R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
\delta \lambda = \lambda^2 (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} ) \delta R
The reason I am confused with this is that I am trying to find the error in λ but λ shows up on the right hand side of my error equation. Also did I get the error in R in the right decimal place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First: replace everything in brackets with 1/K and solve for lambda.
Now find the error on lambda - should clear up your confusion.
 
that works thanks
 
So is the equation supposed to look like as follows: δλ=λ2(1/K)δR? I am so confused.
 
@dab353: welcome to PF;
Take it step-by-step.
Start with the full equation.
Substitute the 1/K in for the brackets... that's just to make it clear.
Solve that equation for lambda.
Do the error analysis like normal.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top