Error equation for the balmer series

  • Thread starter Thread starter wahaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the error in the wavelength (λ) determined by the Bohr model and the Balmer series. The user is confused about how to incorporate the error from the Rydberg constant (R) into their calculations, specifically how λ appears in their error equation. They are advised to clarify their equation by substituting values and solving for λ before proceeding with the error analysis. The importance of taking a step-by-step approach to resolve the confusion is emphasized. The conversation highlights the need for careful substitution and understanding of error propagation in physics calculations.
wahaj
Messages
154
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have to find the error in λ determined by the Bohr model/Balmer series. I am a bit confused with this so I'd like someone to double check my work. I don't know the exact name of this method but basically all you do is take the differential of all the values which have an error to find the error of the determined value.


Homework Equations



\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
nf and ni are discreet values so they have no error in them
R is the Rydberg constant and has an error of +-1 in the last digit so
R = (1.097 +- 1 ) * 107 m-1


The Attempt at a Solution


\frac{1}{\lambda} = R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
\frac{\delta \lambda}{\lambda^2} = \delta R (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} )
\delta \lambda = \lambda^2 (\frac{1}{n^2_f} - \frac{1}{n^2_i} ) \delta R
The reason I am confused with this is that I am trying to find the error in λ but λ shows up on the right hand side of my error equation. Also did I get the error in R in the right decimal place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First: replace everything in brackets with 1/K and solve for lambda.
Now find the error on lambda - should clear up your confusion.
 
that works thanks
 
So is the equation supposed to look like as follows: δλ=λ2(1/K)δR? I am so confused.
 
@dab353: welcome to PF;
Take it step-by-step.
Start with the full equation.
Substitute the 1/K in for the brackets... that's just to make it clear.
Solve that equation for lambda.
Do the error analysis like normal.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top