Error in Algebraic Construction or Computational Translation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual's struggle to solve an algebraic equation, leading to discrepancies between the manipulated form and the original equation. The user suspects errors either in their algebraic manipulation or in the computational translation to a programming format. Key issues identified include potential confusion between degrees and radians in trigonometric functions and a mistake in reversing distribution during manipulation. After receiving feedback, the user acknowledges the error and plans to revisit the calculations to ensure accuracy. The importance of validating each step through value checks is emphasized as a useful troubleshooting method.
WhiskeyHammer
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have an equation that I've been trying to solve. I manipulated it until I had a=f(d) and then did by best to put it into a format the computer recognizes. However when I went back to check the results against the unsimplified version of the equation, they didn't work out as they should have; which tells me I screwed up manipulating the equation to a=f(d) or when I translated it from paper to program*. Im stumped.:confused:

If someone could take a look at my work for errors Id appreciate the second set of eyes.

Algebraic Manipulation:
Untitled.png

Im fairly certain of my work until the fourth line, but if you need to see how I got there let me know.

Computational Form:
a=((-2)(x^5)(G)(q))/(((8)((D-x)^3)(n))-((G)(x^4)(q)(((tan(12))(pi)(D-x))+x)))
This is where I feel like the problem might be. I am relatively inexperienced using long equations in a computer setting.

*the third possibility being that I messed up checking the equation, but it seemed more prudent to start here
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can't see any problems with your algebra.

In your computation it looks like you have degrees in your trig function. Make sure your program is using degrees and not radians, or try converting to radians for the computation.
 
Early on, there's a part of the right of the form P-d. By the end it has become P+d. Look at the step between the second and third lines from the end.
 
haruspex said:
Early on, there's a part of the right of the form P-d. By the end it has become P+d. Look at the step between the second and third lines from the end.

Yup, that was it. I failed to reverse distribute properly.

That should fix all the math that comes after this equation, but it'll take me a couple of days to work my way back through it all again. Its always the fast simple math that messes me up over a long process.

Thanks guys!
 
WhiskeyHammer said:
I failed to reverse distribute properly.
Obvious, perhaps, but the way I track these things down is to plug in some values at the start and end of the manipulation and see if they agree. When I find a mismatch, I binary chop through the sequence of equations to find out where the value changed.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top