Error in Taylor polynomial of e^x

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Taylor polynomial of degree 9 for the function f(x) = e^x about x=0, with the goal of approximating the value of e and estimating the error in that approximation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the Taylor polynomial and the evaluation for x=1 to approximate e. There is confusion regarding the upper bound of the error term, particularly the use of e in the error estimation. Questions arise about the necessity of demonstrating that e < 3 and the implications of the Taylor approximation being less than 3.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various aspects of the error estimation and the implications of their approximations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the choice of constants in the error bound, and there is an ongoing examination of assumptions related to the value of e.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a specific example from a textbook that uses a different constant for error estimation, and participants are considering the implications of their approximations in relation to known values of e.

flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Find the Taylor polynomial of degree 9 of

[tex] f(x) = e^x[/tex]

about x=0 and hence approximate the value of e. Estimate the error in the approximation.

I have written the taylor polynomial and evaluated for x=1 to give an approximation of e.
Its just the error that is confusing me. I have:

[tex] R_n(x) = \frac{f^{(n+1)}(z)}{(n+1)!}(x-a)^{n+1} = \frac{e^z}{10!}[/tex]

and I need to find an upper bound for this to give the maximum error of the approximation.
So far I have

[tex] 0 < z < 1, e^0 < e^z < e^1[/tex]
and then

[tex] \frac{1}{10!} < \frac{e^z}{10!} < \frac{e}{10!}[/tex]

but then the upper bound has an e in it. In a similar example in the book they have just put in 3 instead of e, I guess making the assumption that e < 3. But I'm thinking if i do this I should somehow show that e < 3.

Thanks for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you first approximated e using your Taylor polynomial? That should suggest that e< 3.
 
I have, the approximation less than 3 but that doesn't necessarily mean that the actual value (taylor approximation + error) is < 3, does it?
 
You do not need to show e < 3. Everyone know e is 2.71828 18284 59045 23536... :D

To be honest, I never knew approximation would give lower value (surprised!), but it should be obvious .. see the red line http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Exp_derivative_at_0.svg

You are trying to get upper error bound; mine prof said it doesn't matter what you pick (50,100,..) it just have to be above the max function value!

so e^1 = 1+1+1/2+1/6+.. (you know little more than 2)
Why should take risk of using something like 2.5..
simply pick 3!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies. I had another idea, I could show (by taking the lower sum of small interval slices) that the area under the graph of 1/x between 1 and 3 has to be greater than 1, therefore 3 > e.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K