Error Propagation Homework: Wheatstone Bridge

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around using a Wheatstone bridge to determine an unknown resistance and the associated error propagation. The user has derived a formula for the unknown resistance based on measurements from a slide wire and a resistance box. They express uncertainty about calculating partial derivatives and applying the error propagation equation correctly. The user seeks clarification on whether to calculate a single error propagation value for all measurements or separate values for each set of measurements. The inquiry highlights the importance of understanding error propagation in experimental physics.
Yatty33
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have completed a lab that uses a Wheatstone bridge to find an unknown resistance utitlizing a resistance box and a slide wire.

This will yield the unknown resistance from the following formula...
Ru = unknown resistance
Rs = known resistance from the resistance box
x = distance from 0 on the slide wire in meters

Ru = (x/(1-x))*(Rs)

So for the unknown resistance, I took 3 values of x, and Rs (because Rs changes on the slide wire as x increases)

So here's my problem. I don't know how to do partial derivatives, except in the most basic way, or how to apply the propagated error equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt:

Error Ru = (Rs)\sqrt{}((1/(x(1-x)))^2(\sigma x)^2 + (\sigma Rs/(Rs))^2))

With \sigma whatever being the standard deviation.

The question here is, did I do this correctly?

If I did do this correctly, should I get one value for my error propagation for the entire series of measurments or should I get 3 different error propagations (3 different x, 3 different Rs)?

Will there be 3 different values for error propagation then?

Thanks for your help!

P.S. This is my first post, but I have been using PF for physics help the last 2 semesters, awesome website. This is the first time I've ever had to post something on here :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one at all?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
743
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
652
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K