Essential Supremum Problem: Measurable Positive Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnson123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supremum
johnson123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Problem: Show an example of a sequence of measurable positive functions on (0,1) so that
\left\|\underline{lim} f_{n}\right\| < \underline{lim}\left\|f_{n}\right\| for n\rightarrow\infty

My work: I think its just the indicator function I_{[n,n+1]}

Since \left\|\underline{lim} I_{[n,n+1]}\right\|= 0 < \underline{lim}\left\|I_{[n,n+1]}\right\| =1

For some reason I do not feel to confident in my answer, so any comments are welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
correction

Problem: Show an example of a sequence of measurable positive functions on (0,1) so that
\left\|\underline{lim} f_{n}\right\|_{\infty} < \underline{lim}\left\|f_{n}\right\|_{\infty} for n\rightarrow\infty

My work: I think its just the indicator function I_{[n,n+1]}

Since \left\|\underline{lim} I_{[n,n+1]}\right\|_{\infty}= 0 < \underline{lim}\left\|I_{[n,n+1]}\right\|_{\infty} =1

For some reason I do not feel to confident in my answer, so any comments are welcome.
 
That's pretty good. But the domain of the indicator functions isn't (0,1). Can you build a very similar example using functions defined only on (0,1)?
 
Thanks for the response Dick.

If f_{n}=I_{(\frac{n-1}{n},1)}, then \left\|\underline{lim} I_{(\frac{n-1}{n},1)}\right\|_{\infty}= 0 < \underline{lim}\left\|I_{(\frac{n-1}{n},1)}\right\|_{\infty} =1

Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Sure. That's fine. I was thinking of I_(0,1/n), but you can put stuff on the other side of the interval as well.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top