Estimating Date of Mouse Visit with Radioactive Decay

darren t
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
[Hey I have also been asked this question, A mouse dropping was found in a house in Ireland and had a 14C:12C ratio that was 57% of a modern day standard. Use this value to estimate the aprox date when the mouse visited the house? The half life of 14C is 5715 year

I used the following equation.

t = half life / 0.693 * ln ( A / Ao)

therefore = 5715 / 0.693 * ln ( 100 / 570

therefore t = 4626.42 years?

What do you guys think ? Am I doing it right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I would have done this:
(1/2)xx= 0.57 so x ln(1/2)= ln(0.57) and x= ln(0.57)/ln(1/2)= 0.811 so the mouse dropping has gone through .811 "half lives". Since each half life is 5715 years, that is .811(5715)= 3961 years, not 4626 years.

Your "0.6943" is, of course, ln(2). What do A and Ao mean in your formula? 100 and 570 seem peculiar values. Shouldn't it be either 100/57= 1./.57 or, perhaps better, 57/100= .57?
 
Thanks for getting back to me

A is the amount of radioactivity it has when it is new and Ao refers to how much radioactivity is has now!

Normally this value would be in Curies ect,. but no other data was given!

Your right the value should be 57 not 570, that was a typo on my end, Sorry!
 
hey:

So i did my calculation again

t = 5715 / 0.693 * ln (100 / 75)

t = 8246.75 * ln (1.33)
t = 8246.75 * 0.28

t = 2309.09 years

Its still does not seem right!
I think I might go with your way HallsofIvy :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top