Estimating the Size of Sgr A*'s Emitting Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter albega
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the size of the emitting region of Sgr A*, which flares at X-ray wavelengths. The initial calculation suggests that light travels approximately 5 AU in 40 minutes, providing an upper bound on the radial extent of the emitting region. However, this does not determine the tangential dimensions, and spherical symmetry is assumed for simplicity. The assumptions made, while not entirely accurate, offer a rough estimate that can be refined with future observations. Overall, the calculations serve as a starting point for understanding the dynamics of Sgr A*'s emissions.
albega
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sgr A* is the radio source at the centre of the galaxy. When it flares at X-ray wavelengths the flux increases by x 40 in 40 minutes. Estimate the size of the emitting region.

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is to consider the distance traveled by the light in 40 minutes, which gives 40*60*3x10^8m or around 5AU.

However I really don't understand how that is relevant in terms of finding the size of the emitting region. Any hints? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the region being a cloud of emitters of some radial extent. If all of the emitters begin flashing at the same instant, which ones will you notice first, and when will you finally see all of them?
 
Bandersnatch said:
Imagine the region being a cloud of emitters of some radial extent. If all of the emitters begin flashing at the same instant, which ones will you notice first, and when will you finally see all of them?

Ahhhhh thanks :)

Also, does the above calculation then give the diameter of the region?
 
albega said:
Also, does the above calculation then give the diameter of the region?
It only gives you an upper bound on the radial extent. You can't really extract the tangential dimensions just from the time it takes to reach maximum flux.
You can, though, assume shperical symmetry of the region, and use the radial extent as the diametre.
Neither of the assumptions(shperical symmetry and instantenous flashing of the whole region) is likely to be correct(the second one's physically impossible), but they do give you a ballpark result that later can be narrowed down by future observations.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top