\eta\to\pi^0\gamma decay (Why this decay is forbidden by J?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex_Rob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
Alex_Rob
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Decay \eta\to\pi^0\gamma is forbidden by C parity. But why this decay is also forbidden by statistics (J)?

pi^0 spin is 0
photon spin is 1

But there are can be different situations with full orbital angular momentum of pi^0\gamma.
J=L+S and must be 0. Look like L is 0. But why? Why we can't have L=1 in this case? (unlike in \rho\to\pi^0\gamma decay)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that your first has spin 0, while the product has a spin 0 particle and a photon which is a spin 1 particle.
 
If you put it in a J=1 state the total wavefunction is antisymmetric, and it has to be symmetric because of Bose statistics. [quoting from Vanadium 50 in the ref. link]

rho is a J=1 particle. It can't decay though to pi0 pi0. A similar question has be asked/answered here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-cant-rho-o-decay-into-two-pi-o.278578/
 
Again I am saying that the rho has J=1, so angular momentum conservation does not prohibit it to decay in a J=1 + J=0 particle.
The eta has J=0. And you try to make it decay into a J=1 and a J=0 particle? you can't compare these.
It's not only the CG coefficients, keep reading the conversation.

If you try to make the last configuration of pi0 and gamma to have a total angular momentum 0, then you have to set the orbital angular momentum of the two products to be L=1.
But then you are having an antisymmetric wavefunction describing your boson final states
 
  • Like
Likes Alex_Rob
I think this is much easier to see semiclassically: you are asking if a 0- --> 0- + radiation state is possible. It is not. A 0- state can have only monopole moments, and there are no magnetic monopoles, and the electric monopole is simply charge: zero in this case. Since no moment changes, there can be no radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes Alex_Rob
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top