Euclidean Algorithm: Solving x-1 = (x^3-x^2+2x-2)-(x+1)(x^2-2x+1)

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



The following is a worked example, I circled around the part which I couldn't follow:

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/161/untitleou.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



To begin with, I can't understand why they wrote:

x-1 = \frac{1}{3}(x^3-x^2+2x-2)-\frac{1}{3}(x+1)(x^2-2x+1)

(or 3x-3 = (x^3-x^2+2x-2)-(x+1)(x^2-2x+1))

What formula/theorem were they using here? I can't follow what is done here. :redface:

P.S. On the top it says gcd(2x^3+x^2-2x-1, x^3-x^2+2x-2)= x-1, but it previously said "the last non-zero remainder is a gcd". And when the Euclidean algorithem was applied we found that the last non-zero remainder is 3x-3 NOT x-1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
To begin with, I can't understand why they wrote:
...
What formula/theorem were they using here?
You're asking why it's true? Just use algebra to prove the identity!

You're asking why they knew it to be true? It's the middle line of the preceeding calculation.

You're asking why they thought it would help solve the problem? Presumably your textbook has explicitly presented a version of the extended Euclidean algorithm and is using that.

P.S. GCD's are only defined up to an invertible constant.
 
Hurkyl said:
You're asking why it's true? Just use algebra to prove the identity!

You're asking why they knew it to be true? It's the middle line of the preceeding calculation.

You're asking why they thought it would help solve the problem? Presumably your textbook has explicitly presented a version of the extended Euclidean algorithm and is using that.

Before they apply the algebra to prove the identity they wrote:

x-1 = \frac{1}{3}(x^3-x^2+2x-2)-\frac{1}{3}(x+1)(x^2-2x+1)

Why? Where did the (x+1)(x^2-2x+1) term come from?


P.S. GCD's are only defined up to an invertible constant.

I think I understand, but could you explain a bit more please?
 
roam said:
Why? Where did the (x+1)(x^2-2x+1) term come from?

It came from the middle line of the solution to the previous example. The textbook took the 1/3 out of (1/3x+1/3), placed it into (3x^2-6x+3), and ended up with (x+1)(x^2-2x+1).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top