A Euclidean signature and compact gauge group

Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hello everyone,
I have been reading around that when performing the analytic continuation to Euclidean space (t\to-i\tau) one also has to continue the gauge field (A_t\to iA_4) in order to keep the gauge group compact.
I already knew that the gauge field had to be continued as well but I didn't know anything about keeping the gauge group compact. Can someone explain it to me?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it has to do with keeping the representation of the gauge transformation unitary and finite dimensional.
 
  • Like
Likes Einj
Do you have any idea on how to show it or any source I could look at? Thanks for you reply!
 
I would guess any decent grad text on field theory might cover this. I don't know of one myself. I recall reading something on the complexification in Ryder's book "Quantum Field Theory" but I don't recall him speaking of justification. I don't recall Kaku addressing it directly in his book but I haven't peeked in his text in a while and didn't read it extensively when I last did. Maybe someone else has a suggestion?
 
The point is that you entirely go from Minkowski space with a fundamental form of signature (1,3) (or (3,1) if you come from the east coast ;-)) to Euclidean space, i.e., the proper orthochronous Lorentz group is substituted by O(4). So all four-vectors become Euclidean vectors. The gauge group stays as it is, i.e., a compact Lie group.
 
  • Like
Likes Einj
Oh I see! Thanks a lot
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top