Euler- Lagrange equation proof

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Euler-Lagrange equation proof and the differentiation of the function F. A participant questions the necessity of writing out the total derivative expression when it is known that the total derivative equals zero. The response clarifies the distinction between total derivatives and partial derivatives, emphasizing that they are not interchangeable. The chain rule for derivatives is applied to explain the expansion of the total derivative, leading to the conclusion that the condition of the total derivative being zero is essential for the proof. Understanding this differentiation is crucial for grasping the Euler-Lagrange equation's derivation.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1718433795307.png

The solution is,
1718434123762.png

However, I have a question about the solution. Does someone please know why they write out ##\frac{dF}{dx} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}y' + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y'}y''## since we already know that ##\frac{dF}{dx} = 0##?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are confusing total derivatives with partial derivatives

##\frac{dF}{dx}## and ##\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}## are not the same thing.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
To expand in the above:

In general, without the condition ##\partial F/\partial x = 0##, we would have
$$
\frac{dF}{dx} =
\frac{\partial F}{\partial x} +
\frac{\partial F}{\partial y} y’ +
\frac{\partial F}{\partial y’} y’’
$$
by virtue of the chain rule for derivatives. Apply the condition to obtain what is in the proof.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016 and PhDeezNutz
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top