Euler rotations in galactic plane to change to equatorial

AI Thread Summary
To rotate an axis from the galactic north pole to the equatorial north pole using Euler rotations, one must determine the appropriate rotation angles alpha and beta, where alpha ranges from -pi to pi and beta from -pi/2 to pi/2. The galactic north pole is represented by coordinates l=0, b=90, indicating a singularity at the pole where longitude is irrelevant. This singularity is analogous to Earth's coordinate system, where latitude of 90 degrees means longitude is inconsequential. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the conversion and the nature of coordinate systems at the poles. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately performing the rotation.
birdhen
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
HI there,

I am having problems understanding something.
If I have an axis pointing towards the galactic north pole, and I rotate it using an Euler rotations how can I can I establish the rotation angles needed so that it will be pointing to the equatorial North pole.
I am looking for values alpha and beta where alpha can run from -pi-->pi and beta can run from -pi/2-->pi/2.

Many thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thank you for your reply. I am getting confused still. Would the galactic north pole just have l=0 b=90 in galactic coordinates? I am imagining the surface of a sphere, if b=90 is the top point of the sphere, then there can be no l value as the horizontal plane through the sphere would just be a point.
 
These types of coordinates systems have a singularity at the poles, so the north galactic pole has coordinates (L=anything, B=90). The same is true on the Earth. If the latitude is 90 degrees, it doesn't matter what the longitude is, you are at the pole.
 
OK , of course, thanks !
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top