Euler' s equations and tau = zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student1938
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the angular momentum and torque of a uniform circular disk rotating with constant angular speed about an axis at an angle to its symmetry. The key point is the assumption that torque (tau) is zero, which simplifies the application of Euler's equations and leads to a solution involving precession. The significance of tau being zero suggests that there are no external torques acting on the system, allowing for a stable rotational motion. Participants seek clarification on the professor's approach and the implications of this assumption for understanding the disk's dynamics. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper exploration of the physical interpretations of these concepts in rotational mechanics.
student1938
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
A uniform circular disk of mass m and radius a is constrained to rotate with constant angular speed omega abotu an axis making an angle theta with the disk' s axis of symmetry. Find the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum L and the torque tau exerted on the disk by its supporting axis. Give a physical interpretation of your answer.

We had doen a similar thing in class but the professor assumed that tau = 0 for some reason and then went on to get some precession related stuff. Do I follow the same steps(using Euler' s equations as he did) and if so what is the significance of the tau being zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Come on ..something anything would be great.
 
It would be useful if you post some of what your professor did (in particular: what was the statement of the problem he solved in class?, and what is this "tau" you mention?). The most info you give, the better.
 
The assumption was that tau = 0 and from there, the Euler equations were solved and they gave a frequency. Along with that there was a few steps to show what omega was and that was about it really, I did not see anything special besides that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top