Euler vs. Lagrange: Non-Holonomic Friction & Hamilton's Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter rogeralms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
rogeralms
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The difference between the Euler and Lagrange equations and when to use each.
How to set up Lagrange when the energies are non-holonomic such as friction.
What is the difference between curly delta and plain derivative, eg Hamilton's equation

Homework Equations


Euler's equation vs. Lagrange equation and Hamilton's equation

The Attempt at a Solution


These are general conceptual questions. Please see the attached sheet for more detail. I just need a little more understanding rather than help on a specific problem. Links to sites giving more detailed explanations would be greatly appreciated.[/B]
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
1) The equation is called the Euler-Lagrange equation - your question doesn't make much sense, unless you're referring to Euler's Equations in the context of rotating reference frames.

2) Non-holonomic constraints are a very advanced subject actually, and generally you can't deal with them. With friction, you have to come up with some model, but often \vec{F} = -|\dot{\vec{r}}|^{\alpha}\hat{r} is a good approximation.

3) The total derivative of a function is defined in terms of partial derivatives. Example:

\frac{df(x,y,z,t)}{dt} = \frac{\partial f(x,y,z,t)}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial f(x,y,z,t)}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial f(x,y,z,t)}{\partial z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial f(x,y,z,t)}{\partial t}
 
Thanks for your response. It turned out I was so confused that I did not state the questions correctly. Please see attachment for answers which will clear up the confused questions.
 

Attachments

I can comment on the last question: What it says there is that q(t) is the function that minimizes the action integral.
So you are not looking for a variable value that minimizes something, for which you use a differential (usually indicated with a ##d##), but for a path from t1 to t2 for which you use this variational notation ##\delta##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top