Euler's Forumla, Trig Addition, and Equating Coefficients

AI Thread Summary
Euler's Formula provides a quick method to derive the sine and cosine addition formulas by equating coefficients of the imaginary part. The discussion raises a question about the validity of equating coefficients in the context of complex numbers, similar to how it is done for polynomials. It emphasizes that for complex numbers, equality requires matching both real and imaginary parts. The conversation seeks clarification on the underlying principles of equating coefficients beyond intuition. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the connection between complex analysis and trigonometric identities through Euler's insights.
elarson89
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
One can look into any precalculus book and find a proof of the addition formulas of sine and cosine. Though as most are aware there is a quick way to get the formulas by using Euler's Formula. But to get the formulas by eulers formula, you must equate coefficients with respect to the imaginary part i.

My question is this, equating coefficients was taught to be used for polynomials, because a set of coefficients uniquely determines a polynomial. How can you show the same is true with respect to i? Yes it looks very intuitive, but I'm wondering if there's something a little more powerful than that.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "equate coefficients"? Maybe you could show us what theorem you're trying to prove to make it clearer.
 
Theres, only one addition formula for sine... and then there is the euler's formula e^ix=... and only one way to equate coefficients... I would write them out but I don't know how to embed tex.
 
if you have a + bi = c + di, then by the definition of equality of complex numbers you must have a = c and b = d. so you can equate the real and imaginary parts, if that's what you're asking.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top