Euler's Relationship: Solving Vt=V0ejwt

  • Thread starter Thread starter geo_alchemist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
AI Thread Summary
Euler's relationship states that ejα = cos(α) + jsin(α), which is fundamental in representing AC voltage. The equation Vt = V0ejωt simplifies to Vt = V0cos(ωt) by taking the real part, effectively neglecting the imaginary component, jsin(ωt). The imaginary part, while mathematically significant, does not contribute to the real voltage measurement in this context. The notation R{e^(jωt)} indicates taking the real part of the complex expression, which is equivalent to cos(ωt). Understanding this distinction clarifies how AC voltages are represented using complex numbers.
geo_alchemist
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
May be it's a stupid question but I can't figure it out.

according to Eulers Relationship:
ej\alpha=cos\alpha+jsin\alpha

on the other hand I have equation:
Vt=V0cos wt
and it can be rewritten as:
Vt=V0ejwt

where V is voltage in AC (see link below)
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/electric/impcom.html"

In this case cos wt is at the place of cos\alpha, but what I can't understand is, where did jsin \alpha go?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I quote, with added emphasis:

The link you provided said:
The real part of a complex exponential function can be used to represent an AC voltage or current.
 
that is what I am asking about. and what happens with the imaginary part? And if we can simply neglect it, then why?
 
Two miniature ideas to pay attention to:

  1. Re(eix) is often more convenient than cos(x)
  2. Im(eix) may tell you something else that's interesting
 
After searching through the web, only thing I could conclude and understand is that after several transformation from ejx=cosx+jsinx I come to:
cosx=(eix+e-ix)/2
but, what I can't understand is the equation:
(eix+e-ix)/2=R{eix}
well, the wikipedia says that:
Given the symmetry, we only need to perform the analysis for one right-hand term; the results will be identical for the other. At the end of any calculation, we may return to real-valued sinusoids by further noting that
coswt=R{ejwt}
In other words, we simply take the real part of the result.
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_impedance" Validity of comples representation.

May be it is simple math, but I can't understand if there is any special meaning of curly brackets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If z= x+ iy then the real part of z is Rz= x.

It's exactly the same thing as if I say "the x-coordinate of the point (2, 3) is 2".

That's all it is- it's not the { } that is important but the "R".

If e^{j\omega t}= cos(\omega t)+ j sin(\omega t) then the "real part" is cos(\omega t) and the "imaginary part' is sin(\omega t) (notice that both "real part" and "imaginary part" of a complex number are real numbers).

R(e^{j\omega t}) cos(\omega t) and I(e^{j\omega t}) sin(\omega t).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top