Evaluate Gaussian Integral with Complex $\mu$ and $\sigma$

bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Evaluate:
<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \, dx \, exp\left[-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right] \, ,<br />
where $\mu$ and $\sigma$ are complex numbers.
I tried writing
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \sigma &amp;= s_1 + is_2 \,\\<br /> \mu &amp;= m_1 + i m_2 \, .<br /> \end{align}<br />
The integral turned into
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \, dx \, e^{x(A + iB)} e^C \, ,<br />
where A, B and C are constants. But then things got dark.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigplanet401 said:
Evaluate:
<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \, dx \, exp\left[-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}\right] \, ,<br />
where $\mu$ and $\sigma$ are complex numbers.
I tried writing
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> \sigma &amp;= s_1 + is_2 \,\\<br /> \mu &amp;= m_1 + i m_2 \, .<br /> \end{align}<br />
The integral turned into
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \, dx \, e^{x(A + iB)} e^C \, ,<br />
where A, B and C are constants. But then things got dark.

Convergence appears to me to be dependent upon the value of sigma as this will determine the sign of the exponential coefficient in the Euler expansion of the integrand. One would think that when it is less than zero, the integral converges but diverges when the exponent is greater than or equal zero. That is, when is:

Re[-\frac{1}{2\sigma^2}]&lt; 0;\quad \sigma\in \mathbb{C}

and when is it greater than or equal to zero?
 
You guys mind if I run with this? It's very interesting and I need the practice too as I'm just learning Complex Analysis. Seems to me the integral can be characterized by the attached plot of the complex-sigma plane (mu has no effect on the value of the integral). That is, the integral has one value in red, another value in blue and something else in clear.

Bigplanet, would you kindly provide a proof or contradiction of such.

Perhaps someone in here more qualified than me could comment as well.:smile:
 

Attachments

  • complex sigma plane.JPG
    complex sigma plane.JPG
    7.3 KB · Views: 504
Hi Salty,
I took another crack at the integral last night and got a closed-form result by using the prescription (1) and (2), and completing the square:
<br /> \text{(Integral)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma} \times \sqrt{2\pi}\frac{| \sigma |^2}{\sigma^*}<br /> = 1 .<br />
(Normalization is preserved even though \mu and \sigma live in \mathbb{C}).
 
Last edited:
bigplanet401 said:
Hi Salty,
I took another crack at the integral last night and got a closed-form result by using the prescription (1) and (2), and completing the square:
<br /> \text{(Integral)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \sigma} \times \sqrt{2\pi}\frac{| \sigma |^2}{\sigma^*}<br /> = 1 .<br />
(Normalization is preserved even though \mu and \sigma live in \mathbb{C}).

Ok Bigplanet. It's not happening for me then. Thanks for replying.:smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top