Evaluate the iterated intergal by converting to polar coordinate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZuzooVn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate Polar
Physics news on Phys.org
ZuzooVn said:
Help me Evaluate the iterated intergal by converting to polar coordinate:


http://www.ziddu.com/gallery/4894419/Untitled.jpg.html

hmm … that's \int_0^2\int_0^{\sqrt{2x-x^2}}\sqrt{x^2+y^2} dxdy

ok … I assume you know how to convert dxdy into r and θ

and for the limits, convert y2 ≤ 2x - x2 into r and θ also :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hmm … that's \int_0^2\int_0^{\sqrt{2x-x^2}}\sqrt{x^2+y^2} dxdy

ok … I assume you know how to convert dxdy into r and θ

and for the limits, convert y2 ≤ 2x - x2 into r and θ also :wink:

0≤y≤1
0≤x≤2
0≤r≤2
0≤θ≤ pi/2
:smile:
 
ZuzooVn said:
0≤y≤1
0≤x≤2
0≤r≤2
0≤θ≤ pi/2
:smile:

(have a pi: π :wink:)

No, the upper limit of r will depend on θ.

I repeat … convert y2 ≤ 2x - x2 into r and θ
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top