Evaluating the Second Term of Integration by Parts for $\delta (x)$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the relationship x (d(δ(x))/dx) = -δ(x) using integration by parts. The integration involves an arbitrary function f(x) and shows that the boundary term evaluates to zero due to the properties of the Dirac delta function at infinity. The key step is correctly evaluating the second term, leading to the conclusion that the integral simplifies to -f(0). This manipulation confirms the initial assertion regarding the Dirac delta function's behavior. The discussion concludes with a successful resolution of the problem.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Show that x \frac{d(\delta (x))}{dx} = -\delta (x)
where \delta (x) is a Dirac delta function.

My work:

Let f(x) be a arbitrary function. Using integration by parts:
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(x)\left (x \frac{d(\delta (x))}{dx}\right)dx = xf(x)\delta (x)\vert _{-\infty}^{+\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}d\left (\frac{xf(x) \delta (x)}{dx}\right)dx

The first term is zero, since \delta (x) = 0
at -\infty, +\infty.
How is the second term evaluated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if we are to do this symbol manipulation properly, you should have:
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}xf(x)\delta{'}dx=xf(x)\delta\mid_{-\infty}^{\infty}-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(f(x)+xf'(x))\delta(x)dx=-(f(0)+0*f'(0))=-f(0)
 
Wow, thanks Arildno! I got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top