Evidence for spatial variantion of the fine structure constant

AI Thread Summary
Webb et al. present evidence suggesting spatial variation in the fine structure constant, indicating it is smallest in one direction and largest in the opposite. This raises questions about the significance of these directions, potentially relating to the motion of our galaxy group. The findings remain controversial, with some measurements asserting the constant's stability, while Webb's work challenges these claims. The implications of this variation on cosmic phenomena are still unclear, and further investigation is warranted. Understanding the meaning behind these directional differences could yield important insights into the universe.
exponent137
Messages
562
Reaction score
35
Webb et al wrote article "Evidence for spatial variantion of the fine structure constant".
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3907.
As I understand there exists direction where fine structure constant is the smallest and the opposite direction, where it is the largest.

Do maybe these directions have and meaning, maybe direction of our group of galaxies?
Regards
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
exponent137 said:
Webb et al wrote article "Evidence for spatial variantion of the fine structure constant".
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3907.
As I understand there exists direction where fine structure constant is the smallest and the opposite direction, where it is the largest.

Do maybe these directions have and meaning, maybe direction of our group of galaxies?
Regards

The findings are still a bit controversial I think, as far as I know they haven't been confirmed independantly.
 
There was one measurements, which shows that alpha is constant. But, afterward Webb showed that that their measurements are wrong. Anyway, let as assume that Webb's measurements are correct. Is it possible that this is consequence of this, that, for instance, our group of galaxies travel direction of "dipole"?
 
I don't see how that would affect the alpha constant.
 
I also do not see, how precisely. But there is many possibilities for disturbing such precise measurements.

It is not a sin to see what this direction means in universe. Maybe nothing, maybe something.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top