Atonsis said:
Got it. On a side note, what are your opinions on Wenkel (rotary) engines?
I read that the shape of the Wankel's combustion chamber condemns it to low efficiency. It is long and skinny with high surface to volume ratio.
That results in an unfavorable fraction of heat from combustion, which should go into expanding the working fluid , instead just lost by conduction into the walls.
I owned a 1973 Mazda RX2, bought it brand new Sept '02.. I figured such a tiny car would get tremendous gas mileage - some of you may recall that was when cost of gas skyrocketed to almost 50 cents per gallon. Piston economy cars of the day approached 30 mpg.
Well, i never saw over 18mpg on the little rotary beast.
So i quipped: "I'd save money to put the Mazda in the trunk of my Chrysler and keep on driving it."
My opinion of the Wankel - an interesting idea but not a good one.
To its credit - the RX2 was quite powerful and gave me 100k miles of reliable service.
It was a small, expensive gas guzzler.I'll take Detroit Iron any day.
1951 Chrysler Hemi car engine:
Photo credit to these kind folks: http://evolutsia.com/content/view/614/44/
Observe how the angled valves allow them to be oversize compared to cylinder bore.
Now, imagine a domed piston that raises the compression ratio up to around 13::1 ...
This paragraph is NOT a commercial endorsement, just sharing a good experience:
If you're ever in Ocala Florida plan on a day in Don Garlits' '' Museum of Drag Racing. " It's right on I95.
I liked the machinery.
My greater half Fair Anne, who is an artist, was so entranced by the paint jobs I had to drag her away at closing time !
photo courtesy Don Garlits
http://garlits.com/images2009/SwampRats/swamp%20rat-1.jpg
http://garlits.com/museum.htm
old jim