Exact Sequences - Lifting Homomorphisms - D&F Ch 10 - Theorem 28

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 10, Section 10.5, Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I need help with a minor step of D&F, Chapter 10, Theorem 28 on liftings of homomorphisms.

In the proof of the first part of the theorem (see image below) D&F make the following statement:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conversely, if F is in the image of \psi' then F = \psi' (F') for some F' \in Hom_R (D, L) and so \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d))) for any d \in D. ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

My problem is that surely F = \psi' (F') implies that \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d))) and NOT \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d)))?

Hoping someone can help>

Theorem 28 and the first part of the proof read as follows:

attachment.php?attachmentid=69697&stc=1&d=1399873986.png


Peter
 

Attachments

  • Dummit and Foote - Chapter 10 - Theorem 28 - RESIZED.png
    Dummit and Foote - Chapter 10 - Theorem 28 - RESIZED.png
    60.9 KB · Views: 565
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
My problem is that surely F = \psi' (F') implies that \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d)))

This cannot be true. We know that ##F^\prime\in \textrm{Hom}(D,L)##, and thus ##F^\prime(d)\in L##. But the domain of ##\psi^\prime## is not ##L##, but rather ##\textrm{Hom}(D,L)##. So ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime(d))## makes no sense since ##F^\prime(d)## is not in the domain of ##\psi^\prime##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks ...

Yes, you are right ...

BUT, now I have two problems ...

Problem 1 ... to get \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d))) I simply replaced the F with \psi' (F') since we have that F = \psi' (F') ... but presumably I did something 'illegal' ... can you explain my error?

Problem 2 ... How then does it follow that \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d))) for any d \in D (given that F = \psi' (F')? Can you help?

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
Thanks ...

Yes, you are right ...

BUT, now I have two problems ...

Problem 1 ... to get \phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d))) I simply replaced the F with \psi' (F') since we have that F = \psi' (F') ... but presumably I did something 'illegal' ... can you explain my error?

If you simply substituted, then you would have gotten

F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime)(d)

Thus ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime)## acts on ##d##. You would not get F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime(d))

Now, by definition, we have ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime) = \psi\circ F^\prime##. Thus

F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime)(d) = (\psi\circ F^\prime)(d) = \psi(F^\prime(d))
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks ... appreciate your help ... given me the confidence to go forward from there in my attempt to understand projective modules

Thanks again,

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top