Examples of Non-Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the exploration of non-orthogonal curvilinear coordinate systems, particularly in the context of practical applications and examples. Participants express a desire for realistic scenarios where such systems are utilized, contrasting them with the more commonly studied orthogonal systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that most textbooks focus on orthogonal coordinate systems due to their simplicity and ease of use, questioning the availability of non-orthogonal examples.
  • Another participant suggests a method for constructing a non-orthogonal system in two dimensions using modified polar coordinates.
  • Several participants assert that orthogonal systems are not inherently more "actual" than non-orthogonal systems, emphasizing that results can be equivalent in both types of systems.
  • A participant provides an example of an automobile tire modeled as a membrane, where the material coordinates become non-orthogonal upon deformation, illustrating a practical application of non-orthogonal coordinates.
  • Discussion includes various calculations of interest, such as covariant and contravariant vectors, metric components, and transformations between systems, with a preference for studying these concepts through actual examples rather than generalized forms.
  • A link to a fluid dynamics problem involving non-orthogonal coordinates is shared, along with a reference to a simplified tire example from the literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance and practicality of non-orthogonal systems compared to orthogonal ones. While some agree on the feasibility of using non-orthogonal systems, there is no consensus on their importance or the necessity of examples.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various applications and examples, but the discussion does not resolve the broader implications or limitations of using non-orthogonal coordinates in practice.

Frank Peters
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
I am beginning to study the mathematics of curvilinear coordinates and all textbooks and web sites do not have realistic examples of non-othogonal systems.

What are some examples of non-orthoganal curvilinear coordinates so that I can practice on actual systems rather than generalized examples?

All the coordinate systems that I've examined, such as parabolic cylindrical, ellipsoidal, spherical, and polar cylindrical, are all orthogonal. There must be lots of non-othogonal examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason you just see orthogonal coordinate systems is that they are generally much easier to work with. It should be rather easy to construct a non-orthogonal curvilinear system though. For example, for the two-dimensional plane you could use ##\rho = r## and ##\alpha = \theta + kr##, where ##r## and ##\theta## are the usual polar coordinates and ##k## is a constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: romsofia
I would say that orthogonal systems are the "actual" systems we work in!

Are you just looking for these coordinates in case you come across a scenario in which orthogonal coordinates are not the most ideal? What calculations are you looking to do?
 
romsofia said:
I would say that orthogonal systems are the "actual" systems we work in!
You can work in any system you like, it does not matter for the results. You will get the same results in a non-orthogonal system as you will in an orthogonal one. There is nothing more "actual" about an orthogonal system.

romsofia said:
Are you just looking for these coordinates in case you come across a scenario in which orthogonal coordinates are not the most ideal?
The main example that comes to my mind here is light-cone coordinates on Minkowski space. There are also many generalised mechanical systems where the kinematic metric is not diagonal in the most obvious coordinate systems.
 
Orodruin said:
You can work in any system you like, it does not matter for the results. You will get the same results in a non-orthogonal system as you will in an orthogonal one. There is nothing more "actual" about an orthogonal system.

Yes, which is why I put it in quotes since OP said he wants to practice on "actual systems rather than generalized examples?".
 
An example I can provide is that of an automobile tire structure that is modeled as a membrane. One is studying the structural mechanics of the tire as it is deformed under various modes of load application such as inflation and contact with the ground. The deformations of the tire membrane can be large. The initial shape of the tire is described by a material coordinate system embedded or inscribed onto the surface of the undeformated membrane. The coordinates are initially orthogonal. However, when the tire membrane deforms, the material coordinates become non-orthogonal, and the displacements of the material points are expressed functions of the original material coordinates. This is a standard way of setting up structural deformation problems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and Orodruin
romsofia said:
What calculations are you looking to do?

There are all sorts of things: covariant and contravariant vectors, metric components and the metric tensor, scale factors, differential quantities, transformations between different systems, etc., etc.

In my experience, it is better to study these things using actual examples rather than the generalized coordinates, i.e. x=x(q1, q2, q3), y=y(q1, q2, q3), and z=z(q1, q2, q3), which are universally used in textbooks and web sites.

It is straightforward to construct non-ortho systems but I was wondering if there were some actual systems used somewhere in practice.
 
You are interested in some actual application of this to practical problems. OK.

Here is an example of a fluid dynamics problem from Physics Forums in which non-orthogonal coordinates are used to develop the differential force balance on a free surface of a fluid, including surface tension: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/when-to-use-which-dimensionless-number.933101/page-2 The analysis involving non-orthogonal coordinates starts at post #31.

Here is a simplified version of the tire example I alluded to in a previous post, taken from the open literature:
Miller, C., Popper, P., Gilmour, P.W., and Schaffers, W.J., Textile Mechanics Model of a Pneumatic Tire, Tire Science and Technology, 13, 4, 187-226 (1985). See the Appendix for the development of the equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K