Examples of Perceived Patterns Proven Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter erszega
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Patterns
erszega
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

Could you give me examples of conjectures based on perceived patterns but proved to be wrong? Fermat numbers, with Fermat's conjecture that all Fermat numbers are primes, would be one example that I know of. I would appreciate elementary examples which are easy to understand.

The reason that I am asking for this is that I am doing some business studies, and I would like to persuade fellow students (and maybe the tutors), with examples, that it is very easy to jump to the wrong conclusions from perceived patterns.

Besides maths, any science example would also be welcome.

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
here is one:
31, 331, 3331, 33331, 333331, 3333331, 33333331 are all prime numbers. but 333333331 (this one has eight 3's) is composite.

333333331 = 17*19607843
 
Last edited:
murshid_islam said:
here is one:
31, 331, 3331, 33331, 333331, 3333331, 33333331 are all prime numbers. but 333333331 (this one has eight 3's) is composite.
Cool, haven't seen that before! :smile:
(Of course, what I found surprising with this, was that the pattern didn't break down earlier).
 
I had a little conjecture (easily proved false) when I was a schoolkid. The product of consecutive primes from 2 to any prime PLUS one was prime.

Pattern seemed true for :

1) 2 + 1 = 3
2) 2*3 + 1 = 7
3) 2*3*5+1 = 31
4) 2*3*5*7+1 = 211
5) 2*3*5*7*11+1 = 2311

but broke down for

2*3*5*7*11*13+1 = 30031 = 59*509

Higher order terms broke the pattern too (are the remainder all composite? That would be equally fascinating if true).

Oh well, it was fun for the day or so of excitement it afforded my young mind! :smile:

(BTW, the similar sequence for product of primes MINUS one breaks down much earlier).
 
Last edited:
Curious3141, Sloane's http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A018239 = {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 31, 379, 1019, ...} is the list of primes such that the product of that prime and all lower primes, plus one, is itself prime.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CRGreathouse said:
Curious3141, Sloane's http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A018239 = {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 31, 379, 1019, ...} is the list of primes such that the product of that prime and all lower primes, plus one, is itself prime.

Thanks for that. I never followed up on the sequence properly. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top