Exceptions to the Aufbau Principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter smaan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
Chromium and copper are recognized as the primary exceptions to the Aufbau Principle, which governs the order of electron filling in atomic orbitals. Current understanding suggests that these are the only notable exceptions, as extensive experimental validation has been conducted for other elements, indicating no additional deviations. The exceptions arise because chromium and copper achieve greater stability by promoting an electron from the 4s orbital to the 3d orbital, resulting in half-filled and fully filled configurations, respectively. This behavior is also observed in other elements within their groups, such as molybdenum and silver. The definition of the Aufbau Principle can influence interpretations of these exceptions, and further reading on quantum mechanical explanations and ionization potentials may provide additional insights into orbital behavior.
smaan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Are chromium and copper the only exceptions to the Aufbau Principle? If not, what are all the exceptions? Is there a list of some sort that would state all the exceptions to the Aufbau
Principle?

Thank you.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Upon quick examination of the periodic table, yes they seem to be the only exceptions But keep in mind this is an experimental fact and pretty much all the elements have been tested for the validity of principle for each of them, so if there were any other exceptions, they would probably been known by now! SO for now you can bank on these two exceptions without worrying about the rest, because at this point in time there don't seem to be any other ones!
 
The answer to that question depends to a large degree on the definition of the aufbau principle, i.e. on the method by which you determine the energies of the underlying atomic orbitals.
 
Try these:

How Good is the Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic Table?, Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 1384-1385, (1998)
Why the 4s Orbital Is Occupied before the 3d, Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 6, 498-503, (1996) (Co-authored with M. Melrose).

There's also an interesting article from JCE that I can't seem to find that's all about how to empirically motivate orbitals from ionization potentials. That'll also be of interest to you.
 
They (Cr and Cu) draws one electron from 4s orbital to get half filled/fully filled 3d orbital, granting them pseudo-inert configuration, thus stabilizing them. This phenomena is shown by other members of their respective groups like (Cr, Mo) and (Cu, Ag, Au).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top