Recently, a thread here was closed because it linked to an experiment that seemingly conflicted with the currently accepted theories. While the majority of people agree with these theories, I think it is an injustice to censor evidence that is contrary to a theory - otherwise human knowledge never advances. It's one thing to censor speculative theories without evidence, but an entirely different thing to censor evidence. If the experiment is flawed, let a discussion take place to determine that. So, what do you guys think? Do you guys think people should be able to have open discussions here about experiments?