Exercise 26 in Schutz's First course in GR

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372

Homework Statement


The question as follows:

Calculate the energy that is required to accelerate a particle of rest mass ##m\ne 0## from speed ##v## to speed ##v+\delta v## (##\delta v \ll v##).
Show that it would take an infinite amount of energy to accelerate the particle to the speed of light.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I have done so far, the 4-momentum before is ##(m,mv)## and the 4-momentum after is: ##(E,m(v+\delta v))##, the square of the 4 momentum is conserved, i.e:
$$E^2 - m^2(v+\delta v)^2 = m^2-m^2v^2$$

After rearranging I get the following equation for the energy:

$$E=mv\sqrt{1/v^2+2\delta v /v +(\delta v/v)^2}$$

I think I have a mistake somewhere, since I don't know how to expand this in a Taylor series, I have the expansion ##\sqrt{1+x} \approx 1+1/2 x##, but here I have ##1/v^2## inside the sqrt.

Perhaps I am wrong with the 4-momentum or something else, any tips?

Thanks in advance.

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it wrong it should be ##E=\gamma(v+\delta v)mc^2##, and $$\gamma(v+\delta v) \approx 1+1/2 (v+\delta v)^2$$

For ##v +\delta v = c$, we get the E diverges.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top