Existence of a Critical Point for Differentiable Functions on Closed Intervals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If f and g are continuous real functions on [a,b] which are differentiable on (a,b), then there exists a point x \in (a,b) such that [f(b)-f(a)]g'(x) = [g(b)-g(a)]f'(x).

The Attempt at a Solution


Not sure if my reasoning is correct here... I can assume that closed intervals are compact, and if a function a real function f defined on an interval [a,b] obtains a maximum value at a point x such that a<x<b, and if f' exists, then f'(x) = 0.

Proof: Define \gamma : [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R} by the rule \gamma(t) = [f(b)-f(a)]g(t) - [g(b) - g(a)]f(t). Want to show their exists a point x \in (a,b) such that \gamma&#039;(x) = 0. Observe that \gamma(a) = \gamma(b). Hence if t \in (a,b) such that \gamma(a) = \gamma(b) &lt; \gamma(t), then since [a,b] is compact, f obtains a maximum value on [a,b]. Call this point at which \gamma obtains a maximum value x. x\neq a since \gamma(a) &lt; \gamma(t). Similar reasoning shows that x \neq b. Hence since \gamma obtains a maximum value at x, it follows that \gamma&#039;(x) = 0. This completes the proof. If instead t \in (a,b) such that \gamma(t) &lt; \gamma(a) = \gamma(b), then same conclusion holds following similar reasoning.

I'd like to know whether my reasoning that x can equal neither a nor b is correct.:smile: (and if this is sufficiently rigorous by your standards.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it looks good.
 
Wait I have an individual question for you. I admit to my noobiness, but I just want to ask you a question. So, suppose you could treat this as a form of a chain rule. Could you use inverse function to prove this exists as well such that finverseb-finversea=g'(x)? I mean sorry I didn't symbolize it correctly, but when I see this, I automatically recognize some inverse relations applied with the chain rule. I could be wrong though. You care to elaborate?
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top