Existence of fringe effects with a capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the existence of fringe effects in the electric field at the edges of a plate capacitor using Maxwell's laws. The initial challenge involves overcoming the mental block associated with integrating paths and surfaces for analysis. A key insight is that the electric field must remain continuous when transitioning from between the plates to outside, indicating fringe effects. Another approach involves applying Gauss's law by considering a surface that encloses charge and extends to infinity, which demonstrates that some electric flux must escape through the sides of the surface. This reasoning effectively supports the existence of fringe effects in capacitors.
wimvd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was surfing some old exam questions and I found a nasty one... They asked to prove the existence of fringe effects of the electric field at the edges of a plate capacitor, using Maxwell's laws.
In class we always assumed the ideal capacitor without fringe effects so I'm having some kind of mental block. I have no clue what surface or integration path to choose.
The only idea I have is that from a distance the capacitor should look like an electric dipole and show the same field lines as the electric dipole, and thus there should be fringe effects. But that's not really USING Maxwell's laws is it? :/

Any chance someone can put me on the right path/surface?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the easiest argument to make is that the electric field in boundary-less, charge-less, current-less areas must be continuous. Thus, if you move from between the plates to outside the plates, your electric field cannot drop from a finite value to a zero value instantaneously, so there must be some electric field outside the plates.

A more direct application would be to consider a surface that passes through the metal (and encloses some charge), and extends off to infinity. Since the electrix flux through the top and bottom sides of the box must be zero (one is in a metal, one is at infinity), using Gauss's law, there must be some flux going out the sides.
 
Last edited:
Perfect! Thanks! :)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top