Expanding Universe: Cooling Matter, Gravity & Isotropy

AI Thread Summary
In an expanding universe, the average energy density decreases over time, but this reduction affects the space between matter rather than the matter itself, meaning distant stars do not cool. Gravity does not inherently weaken; it diminishes with distance but remains constant in strength. The concept of isotropy does not apply to the natural forces in this context. The Big Rip theory posits that gravity may weaken due to cosmic acceleration, potentially affecting other fundamental forces as well. Overall, while the universe expands, the fundamental properties of matter and gravity remain unchanged at a local level.
muser
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
in an expanding universe is all matter cooling? also, is has gravity become weaker over large distances? does isotrophy apply to the natural forces?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
In an expanding universe, the average energy density decreases over time. But this decrease is over all of spacetime, it does not affect matter. So, distant stars do not 'cool' over time, just the space in between. Similarly, gravity does not change, it merely diminishes as distance increases. 'Isotrophy' has nothing to do with the 'natural forces'.
 
Chronos said:
In an expanding universe, the average energy density decreases over time. But this decrease is over all of spacetime, it does not affect matter. So, distant stars do not 'cool' over time, just the space in between. Similarly, gravity does not change, it merely diminishes as distance increases. 'Isotrophy' has nothing to do with the 'natural forces'.

the big rip theory suggests gravity will weaken due to acceleration. presumably the other forces as well.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top