Expectation values and commutation relations

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


I am trying to calculate the expectation value of ##\hat{P}^3## for the harmonic oscillator in energy eigenstate ##|n\rangle##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##\hat{P}^3 = (i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2}} (\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}))^3 = -i(\frac{\hbar \omega m}{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}(\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a} \hat{a}\hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} - \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} \hat{a})##

I have used the trick of adding a zero such that ##\hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger = \hat{a} \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger - \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} [\hat{a}, \hat{a}^\dagger] + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a} = \hat{a} + \hat{a} \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}## on the terms ##\hat a \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a, \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat a## and ended up with the expression (dropping the prefactors)

##\hat P^3 \propto (\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}^\dagger + 3 \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a - 3 \hat{a}^\dagger \hat a \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat a \hat a \hat a)##

which I don't think can be simplified further using the trick above. Are there any tricks I can use to tackle the central and outside terms?

Although it looks like the expectation value of all that will be zero due to the orthonormality of states...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't look for tricks. Start with the expanded 8-term expression you have and throw out the operators that you know give zero expectation values. Remember that these are also known as ladder operators. What is the result when they operate on | n >?
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
Don't look for tricks. Start with the expanded 8-term expression you have and throw out the operators that you know give zero expectation values. Remember that these are also known as ladder operators. What is the result when they operate on | n >?

##\hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} |n-1\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \hat a |n-1\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} |n-2\rangle##

##\hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} |n-3\rangle##

##\langle n| \hat a \hat a \hat a |n\rangle = \sqrt{n} \sqrt{n-1} \sqrt{n-2} \langle n|n-3\rangle = 0## due to the orthonormality of states.

I think all of the others go to zero as well, since all the combinations involve uneven numbers of the creation and annihilation operators, which leads to the scalar product of a state with a different state, all of which are orthonormal.
 
BOAS said:
I think all of the others go to zero as well, since all the combinations involve uneven numbers of the creation and annihilation operators, which leads to the scalar product of a state with a different state, all of which are orthonormal.
You got it. :smile:
 
kuruman said:
You got it. :smile:

awesome, thanks for your help.

I'm still getting to grips with Dirac notation, but it's benefits are immediately obvious.
 
BOAS said:
I'm still getting to grips with Dirac notation, but it's benefits are immediately obvious.
Yesss. It allows you to integrate without actually doing any integrals (in some cases).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top