Experimental negative work function?

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I have experimentally determined the work function from the intercepts of a fit line in graph of stopping potential (J) versus frequency (Hz). This is from a photoelectric effect lab. The value of the intercept, which I believe is that of the work function, is returned as negative. (the "a" value in the boxes). I know I am getting hung up mentally on a simple sign issue, but why is this value negative? Is this a sign convention indicating energy must enter the material to knock particles (electrons in my case) off?


Homework Equations


y= bx +a

Stopping Potential = h*frequency - work function


The Attempt at a Solution


My graph is attached.
 

Attachments

  • Graph0.jpg
    Graph0.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
The negative "a" value of the fit line is -1.85 V. The negative sign in this equation indicates that energy must enter the material to knock electrons off, as you suggested. This is because the equation for stopping potential is Stopping Potential = h*frequency - work function. Since the work function is a negative value, energy must be added to the system in order for electrons to be released.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top