Experimental questions about the law of momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the law of momentum conservation in a scenario involving two carts, one with a plunger. Initially at rest, the momentum of the system is zero, but after releasing the plunger, both carts move, raising questions about momentum conservation. It is clarified that while momentum is conserved, kinetic energy is not necessarily conserved, indicating the collision is inelastic. The work done by the plunger converts into kinetic energy, which explains the change in momentum. The key takeaway is that momentum conservation always applies, but kinetic energy conservation distinguishes between elastic and inelastic collisions.
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1
if say I have two carts that is initially at rest, one of the cart has a plunger and the plunger is set so that it's against the other cart. When I release the plunger both carts will travel at a certain velocity.

The law of momentum conservation says that the momentum of the initial system is the same as the momentum of the final system.

As far as my understanding goes, the momentum before the what we can say "collision" is 0 as both carts has an initial velocity of 0, as they start from rest. While on the other hand the momentum after collision (after I release the plunger) is some number, as the velocity is not 0. So how is it possible that law of momentum holds here?

p initial is not equal to p final

I use p to denote momentum here.

Can someone please help me to clear my understanding
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that momentum is a vector quantity. So if one cart has a momentum of 2 kg m/s to the left and if the other cart has a momentum of 2 kg m/s to the right then the total momentum is 0.
 
if you consider at my example here, would you consider this as an elastic or inelastic collision? also how about the kinetic energy before and after the collision?

as far as I understand, before the collision the kinetic energy is 0 as there is no initial velocity
 
-EquinoX- said:
if you consider at my example here, would you consider this as an elastic or inelastic collision? also how about the kinetic energy before and after the collision?

as far as I understand, before the collision the kinetic energy is 0 as there is no initial velocity

Yes, that is correct- so this obviously is NOT an "elastic" collision. In order to conserve energy you would have to consider the work done in pressing in the plunger which turns into kinetic energy when it is released.
 
okay, so on whatever type of collision it is (elastic or inelastic), the law of momentum conservation always holds.. however the kinetic energy before and after the collision is not always the same.. if the kinetic energy of before and after is the same then its elastic collision if not then it's inelastic. Am I right?
 
Right. :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top