Explain Total Energy Problem: Kinetic & Gravitational Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the total energy problem involving kinetic and gravitational potential energy in orbital mechanics. It is established that as the orbital radius (r) increases, the gravitational potential energy becomes less negative, which indicates an increase in total energy despite a decrease in kinetic energy. The equation GM(earth)m(object)/r illustrates that while gravitational potential energy decreases with increasing r, its negative value becomes less pronounced. The overall conclusion is that the total energy increases as the orbital speed decreases. This relationship highlights the nuances of energy changes in gravitational systems.
apchemstudent
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
The answer to the problem is a), the orbital speed will decrease but the total energy will become larger. How is this? It's kinetic energy has decreased and the gravitational potential energy should also have decreased from this equation

GM(earth)m(object)/r where r has been increased, thus smaller Gravitational potential energy. Can some one explain this? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Total energy problem.jpg
    Total energy problem.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 426
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational Potential energy is negative, so when r gets bigger you potential energy gets less negative, or bigger.
 
apchemstudent said:
The answer to the problem is a), the orbital speed will decrease but the total energy will become larger. How is this? It's kinetic energy has decreased and the gravitational potential energy should also have decreased from this equation

GM(earth)m(object)/r where r has been increased, thus smaller Gravitational potential energy. Can some one explain this? Thanks
The change in potential is positive.

U(r) = \int_{R{_0}}^\infty \frac{GMm}{r^2}\hat r \cdot d\vec{s} = \int_{R{_0}}^\infty \frac{GMm}{r^2}dr \hat r

U(r) = 0 -\frac{GMm}{R_0}

So as r increases, U(r) becomes less negative.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top