Explaining basic mathematics to a math illiterate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of explaining basic algebra and exponents to someone with little mathematical background. The initial explanation of squaring a number as a two-dimensional concept was confusing for the learner. Suggestions included simplifying the explanation by defining exponents as repeated multiplication, such as x^2 = x*x. Visual aids, like representing squares with unit blocks, were recommended to help illustrate the concept of area. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear, straightforward explanations when teaching fundamental math concepts.
yyttr2
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
The other day, someone came to me with the deep desire to learn the basics of algebra and he believed it would be best, not to get his information for say...a book, but rather a student.

So, I thought it would be evil not to help him. I started off with basic arithmetic put into algebraic logic.
I.E. x+5=6 or x+7=6
and then, I got to exponents.
I gave him the problem: x^{2}=9
He asked me what the super script '2' truly meant.
Now, I have always thought of x^{2} as a two dimensional representation of a one dimensional quantity (I.E. a one dimensional line with the length of x, and to square x is to extent it equally into the second dimension or...to make it a square). I tried to explain this to him, and that to find the value of x, you just had to think of the nine as a two dimensional quantity, and represent it as a one dimensional line.

He looked to perplexed no matter how much I tried to explain it... I tried to tell him just to think of it in terms of blocks...still nothing.

Can anyone give me a better way to explain this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perhaps just explain what the notation means rather than an interpretation. The power of 2 in x2 is the same as 2 x's being multiplied together: x2 = x*x = 9. A power of 3 in x3 then is the same as 3 x's being multiplied together.

Or, maybe try to show him an 'inductive' structure for an nth power. That is,
x^2 = x \times x
x^3 = x \times x \times x
x^n = \underbrace{x\times x\times ... \times x}_{n}

Maybe even compare it to:
nx = \underbrace{x+x+...+x}_{n}

In explaining x2 as an area, maybe showing some numerical examples would help him more. If 32 is drawn as a 3x3 square, it is pretty easy to count a total of 9 unit squares. If multiplication between two numbers is interpreted as length times width, you can always just count the unit squares as opposed to multiplying length times width, and in the special case where length = width, the total number of unit squares is length2 = width2.
 
Last edited:
2x = x + x
multiplication is repeated addition

x^2 = (x)(x)
exponents indicate repeated multiplication



ps.
I think of it the same way you do. I am weird.
 
yyttr2 said:
He asked me what the super script '2' truly meant.
Now, I have always thought of x^{2} as a two dimensional representation of a one dimensional quantity (I.E. a one dimensional line with the length of x, and to square x is to extent it equally into the second dimension or...to make it a square). I tried to explain this to him, and that to find the value of x, you just had to think of the nine as a two dimensional quantity, and represent it as a one dimensional line.

He looked to perplexed no matter how much I tried to explain it... I tried to tell him just to think of it in terms of blocks...still nothing.
I'm not very surprised that this math illiterate didn't understand it; I don't either. If someone asks what a power truly means, I wouldn't start talking about 'dimensions'. I am curious to hear your explanation of what 3^{\sqrt{2}} means :smile:

I would follow the approach of pbandjay and Noxide (of course this doesn't explain what a non-natural exponent means, but that will come later).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top