Explaining Synchrotron Radiation in Electron's Frame

mikejfe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi. As an "I'm bored Saturday afternoon exercise" I have been working out some stuff regarding bending magnets on linacs. This question came to me while thinking about particle energy losses inside the bending magnet.

Imagine an electron moving in a synchrotron with constant speed, radius and frequency, in the synchrotron's frame. An observer, in the synchrotron's frame, sees the electron with the aforementioned characteristics. The observer notes the electron is emitting x-rays. In the electron's frame, the synchrotron is rotating. Neglect gravity.

Loosely speaking, the observer justifies the x-ray emission by saying the electron is accelerating.

In the electron's frame how does the electron justify it's emission of x-rays?

I know I must be thinking about something incorrectly. This goes beyond the scope of the GR class I took during undergrad, or at least beyond the scope of what I can remember :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Acceleration is not relative.
 
Yes, as cesiumfrog points out, acceleration is not relative; the reference frame of the electron is not inertial and any observer moving with the electron would agree that it is an accelerated frame of reference, hence the emission of x-rays (at least while it interacts with the magnetic field).
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top