Have Any Conjectures in the Random Matrix Model Been Proven or Disproven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Model Random
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
Is any of the conjectures in:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9610043v3.pdf

have been proven/disproven? what has been left still open?

I am thinking of reading this article sometime in the future, hope it's digestable (but first need to finish my studies of QFT and GR.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Anyone?

As far as I know it is based on SUSY as premesis. This is my problem too. We have 3 stringtheorys transformed in S Matrix so far. This is working well. But I think full M Theory is far from it. I'm not skilled enough to interpretate this paper and if we really have a "downgrade" for the M Theory, then we would hear about it on TV and all newspapers.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Back
Top