Why Does Ionization Energy Increase Across the Second Period?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hrnmhmm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Period
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of ionization energy and electron configurations, particularly comparing Nitrogen and Oxygen. It highlights that Oxygen has a lower first ionization energy than Nitrogen, despite having more protons, due to the presence of an electron pair in the 2px suborbital of Oxygen, which leads to increased electron repulsion. The conversation then questions why Fluorine and Neon, which also have additional electron pairs in their p orbitals, continue the upward trend in ionization energy. The explanation provided emphasizes that the increasing nuclear charge as one moves across a period causes orbital contraction, enhancing nuclear attraction and thus increasing ionization energy. Additionally, it clarifies that the stability of half-filled orbitals and the specific configurations of p orbitals should not be oversimplified; rather, the overall nuclear-electronic attraction plays a crucial role in determining ionization energy trends across the periodic table.
Hrnmhmm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My level of knowledge on Chemistry is first year. I'm teaching myself about electron configurations using Google to find and compare sources.

In this webpage - http://www.chemguide.co.uk/atoms/properties/ies.htm
Jim Clark said:
p2vp3.GIF


N ... 1s2, 2s2, 2px1, 2py1, 2pz1 ... 1st I.E. = 1400 kJ/mol
O ... 1s2, 2s2, 2px2, 2py1, 2pz1 ... 1st I.E. = 1310 kJ/mol

It's demonstrated that Oxygen has a lower first ionization energy than Nitrogen despite having more protons. The explanation given is that the 2px suborbital in Oxygen (2px2) contains one more electron than in Nitrogen (2px1), forming an electron pair, and their repulsion negates some positive charge.

If the only difference between Nitrogen and Oxygen is in the electron pair 2px, why do Fluorine and Neon continue the second period's upward trend of ionization energy as normal? Shouldn't the repulsion of the additional electron pairs 2py2 and 2pz2 also affect ionization energy in these elements, reversing the trend?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org


It seems half-filled orbital subshells are particularly stable.
 


Hrnmhmm said:
If the only difference between Nitrogen and Oxygen is in the electron pair 2px, why do Fluorine and Neon continue the second period's upward trend of ionization energy as normal?
No, it's not the only difference. With increasing nuclear charge, when going from left to right in a period, the orbitals contract. This contraction is due to the stronger attraction of the electrons by the nucleus and it will increase ionization energy. Comparing Nitrogen and Oxygen, by Hund's rule,
in Nitrogen the three p electrons will each occupy a separate p orbital. When going t O, the new electron has to go to an orbital already filled whence it experiences a stronger repulsion although the nuclear attraction has increased somewhat, too.
The effect of ionization in fluorine is also that of going from a doubly occupied orbital to a singly occupied one; the repulsion of the electrons being approximately comparable. Hence the only effect which makes a difference is the stronger nuclear-electronic attraction in F as compared to O.

Btw, none of the three p orbitals is singled out, it makes no sense to say e.g. in Oxygen the p_x orbital is doubly occupied while the p_y and p_z are singly occupied .
You can only say that one p orbital is doubly occupied and 2 only singly occupied.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...

Similar threads

Back
Top