B Does Gravity Really Bend Space-Time or Just Create Confusion?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity does not push; it is the curvature of space-time that creates the effects we observe. The common visualizations of gravity bending space-time are simplified metaphors that can lead to misunderstandings. These representations reduce complex three-dimensional interactions to two-dimensional models, which can be misleading. Many people misinterpret these models, thinking they imply a pushing force rather than a warping of space. Understanding gravity requires recognizing the limitations of these visual aids and the complexities of general relativity.
Navid Eghbali9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain how gravity pushes? I know that it bends space-time, and I've seen pictures of this. But in all of the pictures, they are just objects on a flat surface. Is it really like this, because then wouldn't space-time itself have its own gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is the geometry of spacetime and it does not push. Whatever you've been seeing, either it's wrong or you have misunderstood it. Can you give a specific example of what you've seen and how you have concluded that there is "pushing" going on?
 
Navid Eghbali9 said:
Can someone explain how gravity pushes? I know that it bends space-time, and I've seen pictures of this. But in all of the pictures, they are just objects on a flat surface. Is it really like this, because then wouldn't space-time itself have its own gravity.



 
Navid Eghbali9 said:
But in all of the pictures, they are just objects on a flat surface.
I agree, this can be very confusing and it's often used by people who have no idea about what it really represents when they attempt to 'explain' GR. It's only a metaphor where three dimensional Euclidian space is reduced to a two dimensional model and 'our' gravity is used to imply how Einstein's gravity can affect things by warping 3D space (the downward displacement represents the altering of 3D space). If you are finding it hurts your brain then join the club and don't feel you need to relate in a faultless way, everything in that model to real life.
Graphs in general can elicit wrong conclusions when the axes aren't well defined. (Talk to a politician about that!)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top