B Exploring Mass-Energy Equivalence: Impact of Heating on Mass Increase

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Robin04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
AI Thread Summary
Heating a body does result in a slight increase in mass due to mass-energy equivalence, as expressed by E=mc^2. This effect is minimal because the speed of light (c) is a large number, making the mass change negligible. The concept of mass is complex, as it is not solely dependent on the quantity of matter but also on energy and momentum, particularly in relativistic physics. The invariant mass provides a more consistent definition across different frames of reference, distinguishing it from the concept of relativistic mass. Understanding these principles requires a grasp of both classical and advanced physics concepts.
Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16
Does the mass-energy equivalence mean that if we heat a body then its mass will increase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Google will find an explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes Robin04
I should add it's a very small effect. E=mc^2 so m=E/c^2 and c is big.
 
So this means that the mass is not only dependent on the quantity of matter in that object, right?
 
Well, I think it's hard to strictly and generally define what "quantity of matter" is. I would say that is a good non-relativistic heuristic about what mass is. In relativistic physics mass is defined by m=\frac{1}{c^2}\sqrt{E^2-p^2c^2}
E and p are of course frame-dependent, but it turns out that m is not, so it is a good and non-problematic generalisation of Newtonian mass. Contrary to what is known as "relativisitc mass"...
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top