MHB Exploring Proposition 6.1.7 and its Proof in Bland's "Rings and Their Modules"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Proof
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 6.1 The Jacobson Radical ... ...

I need help with the proof of Proposition 6.1.7 ... Proposition 6.1.7 and its proof read as follows:View attachment 6396
View attachment 6397In the above text from Bland, in the proof of (1), we read the following: " ... ... we see that $$\text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} ) = \text{ann}_r(S)$$. But $$a \in \text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} )$$ implies that $$a + \mathfrak{m} = ( 1 + \mathfrak{m} ) a = 0$$ , so $$a \in \mathfrak{m}$$.

So, it follows that $$\bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \subseteq J(R)$$ ... ... "
Could someone please explain why it follows that $$\bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \subseteq J(R)$$ ... ... ? Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 6.1 The Jacobson Radical ... ...

I need help with the proof of Proposition 6.1.7 ... Proposition 6.1.7 and its proof read as follows:
In the above text from Bland, in the proof of (1), we read the following: " ... ... we see that $$\text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} ) = \text{ann}_r(S)$$. But $$a \in \text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} )$$ implies that $$a + \mathfrak{m} = ( 1 + \mathfrak{m} ) a = 0$$ , so $$a \in \mathfrak{m}$$.

So, it follows that $$\bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \subseteq J(R)$$ ... ... "
Could someone please explain why it follows that $$\bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \subseteq J(R)$$ ... ... ? Hope someone can help ...

Peter

Just some thoughts ...

Since $$\text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} ) = \text{ann}_r(S)$$

we have $$a \in \text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} )$$ means $$a \in \text{ann}_r(S)$$ ...

thus $$a \in \bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S)$$ ... ...

But ... we also have that $$a \in \text{ann}_r( R / \mathfrak{m} )$$ implies that $$a \in \mathfrak{m}$$ ... ...

But this means that $$a \in J(R)$$ ...

Thus $$a \in \bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \Longrightarrow a \in J(R)$$ ... ...

So $$\bigcap_\mathscr{S} \text{ann}_r(S) \subseteq J(R)$$ ...Is that correct?


Peter
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top