What Are the Selection Rules for the Hydrogen Atom in LS Coupling?

dsdsuster
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I have a couple of questions about selection rules for the hydrogen atom.

When we talk about these rules in an undergraduate context we are usually assuming LS coupling where we ignore spin orbit coupling so orbital and spin angular momentum are essentially independent. Is that correct?

Subsuming the basic l,m_l rules in this case we have
<br /> \Delta J=\pm 1, \text{except J=0} \rightarrow J=0.<br /> \\<br /> \Delta m_j=\pm 1,0<br /> \\<br /> \Delta S=0 \text{ since the electron is always spin half}<br /> \\<br /> \text{but } \Delta m_s=\pm 1\text{ since we can transition from spin up to spin down?}<br />
If we can indeed transition from spin up to spin down couldn't we possibly have \Delta m_j=\pm -2 from (m_l=1, up) to (m_l=0,down) then in violation of the above rule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is possible in LS coupling. However, the selection rules dictate that the total angular momentum should change by $\Delta J=\pm 1$, so the only way for this transition to be allowed is if $\Delta m_j=0$ or $\pm 2$, with $\Delta m_l=\pm 1$ and $\Delta m_s=\pm 1$.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
492
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top